In the rapidly evolving landscape of AI products, pricing strategies remain one of the most challenging yet critical aspects of building a successful business. Kshitij Grover from Orb recently shared invaluable insights on revenue engineering for AI products, particularly focusing on pricing models that transcend traditional approaches. His presentation cuts through the noise to address a fundamental question many AI founders struggle with: how to effectively price products where value creation doesn't necessarily correlate with user count.
The most insightful takeaway from Grover's presentation is the concept of "value metrics" versus simple usage metrics. Unlike traditional SaaS applications where user seats made sense, AI applications often deliver value through data processed, insights generated, or outcomes achieved. This distinction is crucial because it fundamentally changes how companies should think about monetization.
This matters tremendously in today's AI landscape where we're witnessing a proliferation of tools that deliver exponential value without corresponding increases in usage volume. When companies like OpenAI shifted from charging by token to charging by capabilities (with different rates for different models), they demonstrated this principle in action. The industry is clearly moving toward pricing models that better reflect the actual value delivered rather than arbitrary usage metrics.
One fascinating example not covered in the presentation is Anthropic's approach with Claude. Rather than simply charging by token count, they've introduced different pricing tiers for different model capabilities, with Claude Opus commanding premium prices for its enhanced reasoning abilities. This illustrates how companies can segment their offerings based on value delivery rather than just consumption metrics.
Another instructive case is Midjourney's evolution from subscription-only to a hybrid model that combines subscription access with usage-base