×
AI-generated comments tested in unauthorized Reddit experiment
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

An unauthorized artificial intelligence experiment involving a popular Reddit forum has raised serious ethical concerns about research practices and the use of AI-generated content in online spaces. The University of Zurich researchers conducted a four-month study on r/changemyview without participants’ knowledge or consent, using AI to generate persuasive responses that included fabricated personal stories—highlighting growing tensions between academic research goals and digital ethics.

The big picture: Researchers from the University of Zurich ran an undisclosed experiment on Reddit’s r/changemyview from November 2024 to March 2025, using dozens of AI-powered accounts to test if they could change users’ opinions without their knowledge or consent.

Key details: The research team posted AI-generated responses in debates on the popular subreddit, which has strict rules against such content, claiming they reviewed all content before posting to prevent harmful material.

  • Despite claims of ethical oversight, at least one AI account (“markusruscht”) invented entirely fake biographical details about non-existent people to win an argument.
  • The researchers used prompts instructing their AI to “use any persuasive strategy” including “making up a persona and sharing details about past experiences” while avoiding factual deception.

What they’re saying: The research team defended their actions by claiming “given the high societal importance of this topic, it was crucial to conduct a study of this kind, even if it meant disobeying the rules.”

  • The University of Zurich has supported the researchers, stating: “This project yields important insights, and the risks (e.g. trauma etc.) are minimal.”
  • The r/changemyview moderators strongly disagreed: “Psychological manipulation risks posed by LLMs is an extensively studied topic. It is not necessary to experiment on non-consenting human subjects.”

Why this matters: The incident reflects growing ethical concerns about AI’s role in online discourse and the boundaries of academic research.

  • The experiment fundamentally violated the trust of Reddit users engaging in what they believed were good-faith discussions with other humans.
  • It raises questions about consent requirements in digital spaces where researchers can easily deploy AI-powered accounts without users’ knowledge.

Reading between the lines: This case exemplifies the tension between academic advancement and ethical research practices as AI capabilities expand.

  • Many researchers feel urgency to study AI’s potential for manipulation, but this doesn’t justify bypassing established ethical research standards.
  • The university’s dismissive response to concerns suggests institutional blindness to digital ethics in AI research.
Unauthorized Experiment on CMV Involving AI-generated Comments

Recent News

Unpublished AI system allegedly stolen by synthetic researcher on GitHub

The repository allegedly contains an unpublished recursive AI system architecture with suspicious backdated commits and connection to a potentially synthetic researcher identity with falsified credentials.

The need for personal AI defenders in a world of manipulative AI

Advanced AI systems that protect users from digital manipulation are emerging as essential counterparts to the business-deployed agents that increasingly influence consumer decisions and behavior.

AI excels at identifying geographical locations but struggles with objects in retro games

Modern AI systems show paradoxical visual skills, excelling at complex geographic identification while struggling with simple pixel-based game objects.