CO/AI Subscribe
Wednesday · June 24, 2026 · Issue No. 905
Video

New York Times’ Connections: A Case Study on NLP in Word Games — Shafik Quoraishee, NYT Games

Watch on YouTube

NYT Connections' AI success drives word game revolution

The New York Times Games division has quietly transformed the digital word game landscape, with their breakout hit "Connections" serving as a masterclass in natural language processing (NLP) implementation. In a recent technical presentation, Shafik Quoraishee, a senior engineer at NYT Games, pulled back the curtain on how the team built and scaled this deceptively simple yet addictive puzzle game. What emerges is a fascinating case study in how thoughtful AI application can create compelling user experiences while solving complex engineering challenges.

Key innovations behind Connections' success:

  • The NYT team leveraged sophisticated NLP models to automate puzzle generation while maintaining human-level quality, allowing them to scale content creation for a daily game format.

  • Rather than relying solely on dictionary definitions, they built a custom embedding model that captures cultural context and multiple word meanings, enabling the creation of puzzles that feel intuitive to players.

  • Their hybrid human-AI workflow allows puzzle designers to focus on creativity while automation handles validation and difficulty calibration, creating a sustainable production system.

The brilliance of balanced AI implementation

What stands out most about the NYT approach is how they seamlessly integrated AI assistance without sacrificing the human touch that makes word games compelling. The team created a custom word embedding model that understands not just dictionary definitions but cultural associations and multiple contextual meanings. Unlike generic NLP systems, their solution was specifically optimized for puzzle creation.

This matters tremendously in the broader context of AI implementation across creative industries. While many companies either over-automate (resulting in soulless, repetitive experiences) or under-utilize technology (creating unsustainable manual workflows), the NYT has found a sweet spot. They've automated the validation and technical aspects of puzzle creation while keeping human creativity at the center of the design process. This hybrid approach represents a model that could be applied across numerous content creation workflows beyond games.

Beyond the presentation: what wasn't mentioned

Interestingly, Quoraishee's presentation didn't address the revenue implications of their technological approach. The New York Times has transformed its games division into a significant subscription driver, with reported millions of subscribers paying specifically for games access. Their investment in sophisticated NLP technology likely delivers exceptional ROI compared to traditional content creation methods, especially

Share: X LinkedIn Email
Video Feed

More videos

All videos →
Claude Fable 5: When Capability Meets Economics
Video

Claude Fable 5: When Capability Meets Economics

Anthropic released Cloud Fable 5 with a paradox built in: safeguards sophisticated enough to let a mythosclass model...

Run Agentic AI Entirely on Your Mac—No Cloud, No Latency, No Privacy Tradeoffs
Video

Run Agentic AI Entirely on Your Mac—No Cloud, No Latency, No Privacy Tradeoffs

Apple’s MLX framework is mature enough now that you can run serious agentic AI workflows locally on Silicon...

Hermes Agent Master Class
Video

Hermes Agent Master Class

Welcome to the Hermes Agent Master Class — an 11-episode series taking you from zero to fully leveraging...

CONSULTING

Outsider
Labs.

A management consulting team focused on AI transformations for executives and business owners.

Work with us →