×
Why field order may not improve model reasoning
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

Field ordering in Pydantic schemas represents a subtle but potentially significant design choice for AI developers working with structured outputs. A recent experiment tests whether placing reasoning fields before answer fields in model schemas can nudge language models toward better performance, particularly in non-reasoning tasks where encouraging chain-of-thought processing might improve outcomes.

The experiment setup: The author used pydantic-evals to test whether field ordering impacts AI model performance.

  • The study compared two schema configurations: “answer first, reasoning second” versus “reasoning first, answer second” across various GPT models.
  • Testing used the painting style classification dataset from HuggingFace, creating both simple classification tasks and more complex tasks requiring multi-step reasoning.

Key results: The experiment found minimal performance differences between the two field ordering approaches.

  • Data tables in the article show negligible variations in accuracy between the “Answer First” and “Answer Second” configurations.
  • This pattern held consistent across different GPT model versions and across both easy and hard classification tasks.

Why this matters: Field ordering represents one of many subtle implementation choices developers make when designing AI applications with structured outputs.

  • The hypothesis that placing reasoning fields first might improve model performance by encouraging chain-of-thought processing wasn’t clearly supported by the data.
  • These findings suggest that other factors may have more significant impacts on structured output quality than field ordering alone.

The technical context: The experiment leveraged several modern AI development tools.

  • The author utilized the recently released pydantic-evals framework specifically designed for LLM evaluations.
  • Pydantic, a popular data validation library for Python, is increasingly used to implement structured outputs in AI applications.

The big picture: While this specific experiment didn’t reveal dramatic effects from field ordering, it highlights the ongoing exploration of subtle factors that might influence model behavior.

  • As developers continue building AI systems with structured outputs, understanding these nuances becomes increasingly valuable.
  • The author acknowledges the challenges in definitively explaining LLM behaviors, suggesting more research may be needed in this area.
Does Field Ordering Affect Model Performance?

Recent News

Windows 11 gains AI upgrades for 3 apps, limited availability

Windows 11's new AI features in Notepad, Paint, and Snipping Tool require either Microsoft 365 subscriptions or specialized Copilot+ PCs for full access.

AI chatbots exploited for criminal activities, study finds

AI chatbots remain vulnerable to manipulative prompts that extract instructions for illegal activities, demonstrating a fundamental conflict between helpfulness and safety in their design.

Gemini AI powers smarter automation and camera features in Google Home

Gemini AI now enables natural language creation of smart home routines and enhances camera functionality with searchable video content and automated monitoring.