×
AI art sparks backlash from Jersey’s creative community
Written by
Published on
Join our daily newsletter for breaking news, product launches and deals, research breakdowns, and other industry-leading AI coverage
Join Now

Jersey artists are raising concerns about AI-generated images threatening the creative industry as the technology becomes increasingly normalized. This conflict between traditional artists and AI platforms highlights growing tensions in the creative sector, where artists fear losing work to automated systems that have been trained on human-created content without proper attribution or compensation. The issue points to broader questions about copyright protection, creative authenticity, and the future sustainability of artistic careers in the age of artificial intelligence.

The big picture: Jersey artist Abi Overland has publicly expressed frustration over AI-generated images and their impact on the island’s creative community.

  • She describes witnessing the proliferation of AI-created content on social media as “heartbreaking” and warns about potential infringements on artists’ copyright.
  • The controversy emerges as the UK’s House of Lords recently defeated the government on its Data Bill, demanding stronger protections for artists and musicians against AI systems.

Why this matters: Artists argue that AI systems are trained on human-created work without proper attribution or compensation, threatening their livelihoods and professional opportunities.

  • Overland emphasized the human connection in art, stating: “This is our livelihoods, this is our joy so why would we want to take away the human connection of art to save some money.”
  • Illustrator Jamie Willow noted that artists have “spent years harnessing” their skills, and their work “translates ideas into images with heart.”

The other side: Digital Jersey’s head of innovation Sebastian Lawson suggests artists could integrate AI into their creative process rather than viewing it as purely competitive.

  • Lawson believes trained artists can still create superior images because of their “creative insight” even as the technology advances.
  • The UK government claims to be seeking balance, stating it wants both creative industries and AI companies to “flourish” and is “consulting on a package of measures” to benefit both sectors.

What’s next: The UK government has indicated no changes to copyright laws will be considered unless they are “completely satisfied they work for creators,” suggesting ongoing negotiations between creative and technology sectors.

Jersey artist's 'heartbreak' over AI-generated images

Recent News

Closing the blinds: Signal rejects Windows 11’s screenshot recall feature

Signal prevents Microsoft's Windows 11 Recall feature from capturing sensitive conversations through automatic screen security measures that block AI-powered surveillance of private messaging.

AI safety techniques struggle against diffusion models

Current safety monitoring techniques may be ineffective for inspecting diffusion models like Gemini due to their inherently noisy intermediate states.

AI both aids and threatens creative freelancers as content generation becomes DIY

As generative AI enhances creative workflows, it simultaneously decimates income opportunities for freelance creators like illustrators who are seeing commissions drop by over 50%.